Ikabod: The real message of the election in 2012 - Part 1: Departed Observer

Christian Conservative religious rights have emerged like an astonishing boxer, affected by a knockout blow, for a month from the results of the 2012 election. Some people come back to their energies with enthusiastic passion but others are desperating for the outcome of the election. The strange fact of this case is that despite the conservative owed emotional trauma, the election in 2012 really did not change anything. We have the same president, the same party still controls the House of Representatives and the same party is controlled by the Senate. Even the governor 's rule of the state changed only by certain states. So why not despair if nothing has changed?
I believe that the actual story of the election in 2012 does not prove the income registered in the ballot box on 6 November but rather proves the true state of Christian conservative religious rights . Perhaps despair is being expressed as a result of a potential realization of the spiritual condition of religious rights - a state in which "Ichabod" is crying There is no glory ) Perceive that "Christianity has passed" from the political institutions and movements that Christian conservative religious rights have long been trusted (1 Samuel 4: 21-22).
I have been politically active as a Christian and a constitutional person for about 20 years. I served as leadership skill, hosted events and activities, support for the campaign, chairman of the party. I have written "discreet" with many people in the community and seriously intersect people who know this Christian or constitutional political activist in the area. Everyone in these circles does not support all my political activities (mainly because my behaviorism is a third party and has independent characteristics) , Most people agree on basic values, everyone in the same team strives toward the same goal of honoring God, restoring constitutional governance, maintaining freedom, founder of the United States We keep philosophical philosophy.
There was always a difference in strategy in our rank, but I had a sense that I was always surrounded by my brothers who were moving toward the same goal. However, in July of this year I found myself as if something changed. It seemed as if he was running in the same race, but the majority of the people who thought he was running in the race had disappeared.
I could not believe that the first election in August thought it was the result of my imagination, battle fatigue, or mild disappointment. The election revealed the present state of Christian conservative religious rights and documented the starting point from the value that it has long supported. In that election, conservatists rejected most of God's honors, constitutional advocacy, freely loved candidates, over the secularists, humanistists, socialists, and even prosodomide candidates.
I am now mainly engaged in third parties and independent politics, in my opinion, I am used to refusing my candidate by a nonlogically fixed population in the paradigm between the two . However, in this case, I love freedom that expressly respects God, supports the Constitution, and loves Republican candidates. Remember, this is not a general election, but people who choose between "R" and "R", or those who may condemn the result of "liberal". This is a major election in which Christian conservative religious rights (usually associated with the Republican Party) select candidates that best reflect their values and candidates that they would like to be represented in the general election It was.
This year's first presidential election was unusual, definitely outstanding in that it honored many gods, supported the Constitution, and characterized many candidates who love freedom. We publicly hired Christian pastor who admired God and carried out a positive campaign to the governor as a Republican who believes in the value of traditional conservatism and religious rights. There was actually a second independent "freedom" pastor who was independent. Both were rejected by Christian conservative religious rights and received only 3.2% and 0.7% of the vote. Instead, conservative voters judged that I was a campaign against the boy scout ban on secularists, humanistists, homosexuals, and a "socialist light" as a sitting state An Attorney General overwhelmingly chosen by men led the case against a family-owned drugstore that refused to sell abortion drugs.
We are a leader who protects marriage against assault of homosexual lobbies and in his opinion it is consistently constitutional and even if we are talking about states by events organized by Christian ministries, The conservative religious right of Christianity was chosen with a margin of 4-1. While serving another Republican candidate - King County Council, he supported homosexual marriage and the Council reached an agreement of 99% with the Democratic Attorney General 's candidate and took office as the council.
Similar results were obtained for constitutional enforcers who were appointed Secretary of State under the Constitution Party banner and Christian reformers seeking education minister (non-faction). The only rugged Christian who asserted freedom executed for one of the ten state offices sent to the general election by conservative voters, the Constitution, to the race where he was the only Republican candidate there were. In other words, the antiseptic that challenged "R" lost in the general election, but there was no option to vote for him in the preliminary election.
Do you think that the famous Liberalism of Washington State seems to be a phenomenon that is emerging even among the Republican voters I currently live in? Candidates in the US - a man known for his teachings on the principles of the government of the Bible and the Constitution and the same opinion of his radio. Instead, conservatives selected 63% of constitutional veto rights on behalf of the incumbent puppet that voted for the National Defense Permit Act (NDAA) which authorized the civilians' occasional detention.
Here in a legislative area in the eastern part of Washington, there were no Democrats in the race and only two Republicans were there. The incumbent who voted in common with Democratic lawmakers of the legislature co-hosted the state's infamous gay marriage legislation, but the challenger, Constitutional Research Institute The course was firmly a professional Bible marriage. result? Constitutional Republican challengers have received little conservative support and are above 10-1 as one of the more conservative areas of the country that chose to be an incumbent republican.
And in Washington, the presidential election race is missing, so it has not happened here. After many years of election campaign and months of presidential election, Christian conservative religious right, 0.2% of the general voting and Rep. To the delegation of the Republican Congress, Michelle Bachmann). Conservatives confine 10% of the general voting and 154 delegations for professional freedoms and constitutionally restricted parliamentary members Ronpol (TX) messages in the cave. However, despite having faced the strict God and respecting the candidates, despite having faced the Constitution to defend the candidates, Christian conservative religious rights, which allied with the Republican Party and served as support points, accounted for 52% of the general voting, And the leader of Wall Street insider and foundation who led the representative of 1,489 people to Mitt Romney Massachusetts state to make gay marriage the first state to adopt marriage. A man with a rating of "D-" on the right of a gun in Article 2 amendment and a rating of flip floating on abortion. The best man I could say did not represent one doctrine of traditional conservatism.
A big story of the election in 2012 is not a defeat of a discreet right by a liberal leftist but a Christian conservative religious right is a deviation from the value that it once agreed,
I will not talk about liberalists who are defeating conservatives in the general election. We are talking about the person Christian conservative religious right chose for himself in the primary election.
The outcome of the first election may argue that it is the work of the Republican Party leadership who claims to be "a candidate to defeat democracy in the general election." Of course, in most cases, candidates lost in the general election and religious voters of the Christian conservatives were violating their values in vain. However, most voters are not politically plugged in and even doubt knowing which candidates the Republican leadership is promoting.
So, I will explain the starting point of this wholesale by people, exercise, organization that claims to be the guardian of that value from the values of the Bible, the Constitution Principle, the traditional conservatism teachings. I insist that it is not logical, it is not natural. There is a supernatural element involved in the popularization of society-wide segments that support distinct identifiable ideology, and when running in the opposite direction of the value that was declared.
I saw the outcome of the primary election and stuck to me that it was a form of justifiable judgment. It is not a justification of revenge, it is not justification of just being mental justice. If you have not promised to love the truth more than anything, you will believe the lie. Unless you are sacrificing and concentrating on duty, you will fall for injustice. And if you "do not believe in the Lord with all your power", you begin to trust other things, such as political power and the influence of artificial political parties and institutions. And when you learn to trust political power to save you, you do anything you have to do to get it.
Departure from this traditional Christian worldview, the values of the Bible, the principles of the Constitution, our founder's governance philosophy did not happen overnight. This is part of the process that worked in generations or more workplaces.
In the second part of this message, we will look at the process where this departure took place.
Related Photos



Comments
Post a Comment