I can not hire a lawyer to protect my house from mortgage fraud

"A plan to deprive the people of the Constitution of all the divisions to overthrow the fundamentals of the Constitution by depriving the people of the benefits, blessings, and the end of the Constitution, It will justify the revolution." John Adams, Novanglus Papers, 1774

AM I took the step one step

Can the lender take me to my house?

Originally, twelve of us studied individually and worked gently as a group sharing that knowledge. We operated like members of a club with similar interests. We were learning at a much earlier stage than individual borrowers, but we were walking along the respective courses through the courts representing ourselves. Is it wrong? Are we going to lose? I was confidently worried about various eras in the past seven years with confidence. However, our members have won seven in the past 8 months. The answer is that. In fact, I do it in full time. I feel that is my civic obligation.

I am sitting in the court and I heard that many judges are alerting borrowers who are trying to express themselves as "a need to get a lawyer" Pro se party. Almost all of my clients over seven years or more believed that it was the law, as the judge said to them. It is not. However, the judge often felt it was more likely that the borrower will talk on behalf of a competent lawyer. It is a good level of advice at a general level. However, today's judge has missed details on a new type of fraud which was virtually unknown until about 1999, and can provide a secure way to lose a family home to a lawyer.

Anyway you can not borrow a lawyer at this time. In addition, few lawyers know the mortgage finance law. There is not enough space here for details, but it is easy to understand if there is enough luck to meet someone who knows what has changed over the years due to lawyers and judges. I think someone would have told me in 2011.

In fact, in case it is a fraudulent foreclosure, why borrowers can not afford a lawyer so why do I have to lose a house? They are victims of crime. They are not criminals.

In the case of a borrower you are threatened with foreclosure you can not find a good lawyer and give up the maximum and most expensive ownership even if you can not pay him or her Is it? Will you own it so far? Maybe. But I say no. I know more than everyday everyday, in this one subject, I am an expert.

I lost the smoke behind the court by the lender of this "con artist" and stealed the house without "borrowing" seriously to the borrower. Yes, during the real world era (before 1994), it was all very easy.

I borrowed it from a banker I knew. You have signed a promissory note detailing the amount you borrowed and the terms of payment that you agreed. Bankers needed to know that they would build a house they had purchased as collateral if they could no longer pay to lose the money they lent to you. Documents signed, including the conditions agreed between you and the bank, are called security certificates. In states that use judicial foreclosure rules, collateral products are called mortgages. In states that use non-judicial foreclosure rules, securities certificates are called trust certificates and they are not even called mortgages in these states. Since then, we all call the term mortgage a mortgage. Injunction parties rely on confusing you and the judge. (I cover it more completely with another article).

Now the conditions agreed with those documents are your mortgage. Promised notes are essential for trading and are the most important documents you signed. We made these fair monthly payments. You and the banker tracked the payment and the promissory note was marked as paid and returned when your loan was dispensed. The original promissory note has been returned to you. every time. You can believe that the financial industry does this. But for borrowers, lawyers, and judges born around 1980, this seems like a fantasy. Because complying with banking laws and laws since 1995, when Microsoft first offered free e - mail at light speed.

However, as few borrowers do not know their own rights, as these same cheaters ruined the economies all over the world, most borrowers cost $ 5,000 to tell lawyers their rights I can not afford to pay. When a huge number of borrowers are illegally drained, they tell the children that they must change their school, borrow a truck that is not affordable, head for rented houses and apartments. The party that illegally took their house reported the foreclosure to the credit rating agency, and the credit rating company damaged the credit.

Forks, this is America I grew up!

I will stick around myself to tell them that everything must go to these victims' borrowers too quickly. There is no case in "bank" threatening foreclosure. This "foreclosure party" can not be done and you will not show empirical evidence that you even have a real party to borrow. Because they are not the party you owe.

But unless you fight without stopping the turn, they will escape with it. Your case is very good, you just do not know it.

I will do. I am trying to become a person telling you why you have more than you want to help back fighting. I have real estate brokers, real estate developers, home builders, mortgage brokers, consultants for a long time. I am supposed to be a real smart man. What do you know?

I stole my house because the GMAC mortgage cried, I got angry. Real Mad. I have been mad at all since 11th November 2011. But I did not borrow the truck. I fought. But like all the Americans in all occupations, I could not hire a lawyer because the economy seriously damaged my income. At that time, I learned that a lawyer had to be present.

I detained my house for the suspension of the court for seven years, but the most terrible lie from a court lawyer is that nobody can dream of it. Fortunately I now know why I can stick around. The explanation of what is different today is too long in this article, but I think that I will immediately make seven years worthwhile.

That's right, I've mentioned a lot of problems (of course nothing) about how borrowers are trying to protect their homes without money or information to hire a lawyer.

The answer is to make it Pro Se. Pro Se means "I am representative of myself."

It sounds extremely intimidating at first. It was a very difficult time for anyone I have ever talked about, even though I was thinking about it. But that is possible. It is legal. In fact it is your constitutional right.

First of all, information is necessary. What is wrong with your "lender"? What did you do correctly? How can I find my way through the trial system? You can not tell lies. You really need to know the real truth and what is going on. When we try to deceive the court with misleading words, we do not look better than the characters we are opposing. Truth is a very powerful weapon when used correctly.

Those who are trying to secure mortgages to you are not entities funding your loan. As you did, I'm not going to insist you did not get a loan. But it is not from the lender listed on your loan paper. It came from an unknown source in an illegal way. (Just riding along that idea, you can know what I mean later.)

In other words, those who think you are closed do not have the right to collect money from you or the "assign" loans to another entity. Therefore, your loan could not be sold. Because the seller did not have ownership for your sale purpose, the seller and the purchaser of your promissory notebooks have not written a contract and you can not transfer your loan by selling.

However, if you do not protest at the court, the loan has been sold and now fraudsters / false recipients (actual legal provisions in all 50 states) will steal your house. If they do not claim to be true, but you do not object, the judge must take a lie as the truth by law. Looking at the borrowers at the court and reading the motives of the lawsuit, I am confronted with what the borrowers thought they could not object. Heck, what did Perry Mason do? object. What did Barnaby Jones do? object. What did Captain Kirk do with Boston Legal? Yes, he opposed long and loudly. The court is not a church. You should act professionally, but you have the right to do what you say.

The way to bring out a mortgage fraud case is a way of bringing a lawsuit (mortgage litigation is common in household fraud, but today there is a better way). The national average cost for filing a foreclosure fraud case is 100 to 200 dollars. Please compare what lawyers are seeking.

You are now a plaintiff, it is no longer a defendant. You will not go to the court for a while, but you must claim your rights and the party claiming the right to stop the right will try to block you by lying. However, this is all a movement using the appropriate law and is immediately on the paper, not in front of the judge of the court. Probably never, is the way we won the last five times. It is my belief that I decide to choose a person with the strength of knowledge to stay there and to fight the seized party.

We can organize your documents and develop strategies to prove that you did not receive money from the lenders of fraudsters claiming what you did. We can answer your questions and help with your presentation It is what we did for ourselves and we can do it for you. A lawyer may be using a brief lawyer in the court when the right time comes at a fraction of full-time attorneys fees when a lawyer can show why he will win for you Hmm. This will cost a small part of what you are thinking to save your house. Did I say that you can help relieve your anxiety with this knowledge?

Related Photos