Does your criminal record interfere with the search of your work? How to improve your employment prospects

A few months ago I talked with a resident doctor who signed a contract with a hospital in Pennsylvania that will start a one - year fellowship in autumn. But within 90 days before she started fellowship, the hospital "canceled" the contract due to a ten-year-old misdemeanoral crime. The hospital is (1) despite the fact that the resident has completed her employment application to the truth, in particular, that she responded that she was not convicted of a felony, in particular, (2) a misdemeanor is a doctor It has nothing to do with friendship relations as.

Last month, I talked with a bank clerk who worked for California state-owned banks and was promoted with the same bank in Alaska. She has worked for this bank for years in California and has been married after checking his previous criminal record. But within a few weeks of starting a new job in Alaska, she dismissed marijuana accusation of minor offenses from Delaware. Because of this fired fee, the bank broke up her.

Beyond the sacrifice of random physicians and bankers, these cases can overcome the persistent and widespread social problems, criminal history, how to overcome the criminal record and maintain employment It reflects what you can do. About 600,000 men and women are detained each year. In addition, every year millions of people accused of criminal offenses were executed without executing prison time (eg, fired fires, innocent wills, probationers). In order for these adults to take care of themselves and their families, to positively contribute to American society and not to repeat the crime, we need to find and maintain wealthy employment. Unfortunately their criminal record is a huge obstacle to the effort to work.

In most cases, these individuals need to rely on future employers' enlightenment. Most workers in the United States (with notable exceptions in Montana State) are employed "based on employment". Under the employment will, enterprises should decide not to hire employees with potential will for some reason unless they violate applicable law (such as anti-discrimination law) or contract (eg collective bargaining) Can contract).

As a result, employers are likely to have such a right if an enterprise refuses to apply for applicants, or decides to dismiss a worker for a criminal record. In most jurisdictions it does not matter whether the basic criminal offense is minor, whether it is convicted or not objectively related to basic duties. In this respect, the employer retains the right to exercise this employment.

Fortunately, for criminalized workers, important minorities in the state are taking legislative measures to improve this harsh reality. 14 states prohibit discrimination against former offenders' discrimination in the workplace. In Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana, Minnesota, New Mexico and Washington State we prohibit former criminal discrimination in office. In five states in Hawaii, Kansas, New York, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, this type of employment discrimination is banned both private and public. (In addition, in some municipalities such as San Francisco, California employers' ability to rely on criminal record information for employment decisions is limited.

For individuals with a criminal record that fall under one of these discrimination laws, their future employers may have a "reasonable" or "direct" relationship between the history and the proposed employment If not, for example, a doctor living in Pennsylvania may have a legally recognizable means to challenge hospital fellowship rejection based on an unrelated, ten years ago conviction of misdemeanoritty. Similarly, according to state discrimination laws, New York bankers could successfully challenge abandonment based on the marijuana charge of 18 years old.

By contrast, any future banker in any of the aforementioned five states, in the light of the estimated cause-effect relationship between the nature of the belief and the required duties, when receiving a serious embezzlement judgment, Position likely to not take. It is also important to re-emphasize that this "relationship test" is important only in the above-mentioned states that prohibited or restricted discrimination against former offenders of private and public employment. As a result, despite the nature of criminal history, job seekers of a similar position seeking work in the vast majority of states, the state does not prohibit these forms of discrimination, so the direct legal remedy potential Private sector or public sector without any means.

Even if you have a criminal record and you are looking for work in one of these states without discrimination prohibition there are other options to improve the negative impact of your records on job hunting. For example, a person who commits a severe minor offense (eg, disorderly act; fare jump) and possesses a relatively clean criminal record, as opposed to belief without prison time, gives the judge 'prejudice protection Observing "or" PBJ "disposition. In essence, the underlying criminal case will be detained for a year by PBJ or "Stit" disposition. If the defendant has not committed another crime in the past year, the fundamental accusation is rejected. (However, if the defendant did another violation during this protection period, the public prosecutor could commit this second offense and seek conviction for the first crime.) The main advantage of PBJ is , The defendant, or her record. In the background survey on employment, many companies are focusing on beliefs. The absence of a conviction only increases the personal prospect of obtaining future employment.

(1) If an individual can resolve criminal liability with dismissal, criminal proceedings, or criminal proceedings (ie, dismissing a lawyer's claim), PBJ or thief, or similar non-crime (2) If it turns out to be guilty for a nuisance act (eg interfering with peace) or a single nonviolent criminal offense, then you can claim "delete" on the Criminal Law record. "If workers with this type of criminal record can expire records, the state will remove references to this criminal act from courts, police, car records and files, and furthermore, due to the effect of the revocation order, Employers can "deny" the above claims or the existence of guilt to "truth" in seeking future employment.

If you have a more serious criminal record (such as "serious felony judgment"), you can consider other alternatives to eliminate or minimize the effect of your job search record. In general, if a previous rapist completed a sentence and sent a productive life on the way without being annoyed for the necessary period, you can file an amnesty to the National Hearing Commission or similar state agencies. With the pardon, former offenders can ask you to extinguish their records. (In some jurisdictions, the underlying record is automatically cleared by pardon issue).

Furthermore, as in the process of obtaining amnesty, some states have allowed the former criminal court to comply with the law and to impose "convictions" based on the formation of a judgment as a productive citizen and on the number of years There. After the culprit is finalized, former offenders can move so that their records will disappear.

If an individual with a felony record can not successfully listen for amnesty or conviction, he can check whether it can obtain a "remedial certificate from disability" or "good quality certificate" . Essentially, the administrative agency of a particular state (eg New York, Illinois state) should inform a qualified former offender of such a certificate "to create a rehabilitation premise relating to a specific crime or crime" Will be issued. See N.Y. § 753. Employers or licensing agencies in the issuing country have a legal obligation to "take into account" the applicant's certificate in making employment or license decisions. See N.Y. Article 753 (2) of the Act. Thus, such certificates may significantly enhance the opportunities for objectively rehabilitated original criminals to acquire employment and / or to secure professional licenses (eg, barbaric licenses).

In summary, if there is a criminal record, I would like to consider all means to eliminate the existence of records and minimize the impact of records on employment options. Those who have received a minor "youthful minor" misdemeanor or conviction must find a process to clean up your records relatively easily, if not easily. For you with a more serious criminal record this road may be more difficult but potentially viable. Given that many employers believe that they can discriminate uncritically against uncriminals regardless of the underlying execution of the crime and the revealed rehab, these post-judgment measures are It only serves to improve employment prospects.

Likewise, if you encounter difficulties in other workplaces, you can effectively ask for your remedy. There is no need to endure abuse in silence. You have the right!

Related Photos