Agent - client verification v. Referral service


Matching lawyers and clients provides important information to both clients and lawyers before the parties actually speak. This saves time and helps both clients and lawyers make better decisions. In 2003, the Utah State Bar recognized the benefits of attorney - client reconciliation service and partnered with a lawyer matching company. With this partnership, Utah's lawyer was able to receive screened cases of potential new customers. Utah citizens not only received referrals, but also gained excellent service that allows you to choose a pre-selected Utah lawyer.

It is important to remember that lawyer and client matching services are not referral services. The referral service recommends a lawyer to potential customers by choosing the lawyer's name from the list and providing that name and other information to potential customers. This service and recommendations are often provided by state and local bar associations or organizations approved by the appropriate bar association.

However, unlike referral services, attorneys - customer reconciliation services will not propose, recommend, or release the names of specific attorneys to customers. Lawyers - Client matching services think that clients should make informed choices rather than receiving recommendations. They simply provide free legal resources for clients to securely submit their claims. After the complaint is submitted, you will have the opportunity to respond to the judged and approved attorney. Finally, only the client and client select attorney rights for them. There are no recommendations, suggestions, introductions.

When lawyers compete, customers win. This fact is increasingly recognized by governments, administrative agencies, and courts. For example, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) responded to a senior court seeking comment on the Alabama State Supreme Court's Occupational Code of Ethics, saying, "A state that encourages competition in the legitimate profession to the utmost It is compatible with other goals of the Federation. "

In addition, on May 26, 2006, the FTC commented on the issue of the Texas State Professional Ethics Committee as to whether Texas lawyers are ethical to participate in online legal mating services. The FTC says, "There is the possibility of reducing consumer costs to find legal representatives and increasing competition among lawyers."

The North Carolina Bar Ethics Committee, unlike passive recipients of inquiries for attorney inquiry service, users of the company website evaluate the information and evaluate the offers he received from potentially appropriate ones The lawyer decides to contact, as it can not decide which lawyer is fit for the client which must be. Therefore, potential harm to consumers of pure attorney introduction service is avoided.

It is important to recognize the difference between legal matching services and referral services. The research system was very useful for the public when the investigating attorney was very difficult. But now, people can review websites to learn about lawyers practice, service, reputation, if they go online.

Introduction services are designed to provide assistance to people in front of the Internet. However, when a person requests and selects a lawyer, it is necessary to contact a lawyer. In reviewing the lawyer and making it complete and choosing, it is necessary to consult with a legitimate matching system.


Related Photos





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to restore your citizenship in Tennessee

Image
The Tennessee State Assembly formulated a procedure to restore the citizenship of people convicted of "infamous" crimes (known as the more serious "felony"). There are some restrictions on the restoration of citizenship, but the citizenship has recovered greatly to the level before the conviction. Code annotations 40-29-101 to 40-29-106 in Tennessee State provide requirements for restoring citizenship. As the law has changed, the rules applicable to those convicted after 30 June 1996 (convicted instead of guilty) are somewhat different from previous rules. Here we will deal with individuals convicted after June 30, 1996. Repair can be done by petitioning the governor's pardon or circuit coat. Since amnesty is hard to come, most people have to petition the Circuit Court to restore citizenship. The jurisdiction is in two places, the county where the crime occurred and the county where the respondent currently lives. In practice, it is easier to apply for a place w...
Read more

Employment Act of Indiana State: Overview of Wage Payment Law and Wage Claims Act

Image
Recently, the Indiana Employment Law topic that produced some interesting discussions includes the wage payment method under IndooCode. Wage claim provision under industrial code. 22-2-9. Both of these laws are managing the options available to employees who believe employers are not paying their wages. However, it is important to know the differences between the two statutes. First, the wage payment regulation governs the time that an employer must pay wages to employees. If an employee assigns a wage payment request to the Department of Labor ("DOL") and DOL accepts that award, you can not file a lawsuit under the wage payment law unless DOL ratifies it. Also, join the employee's case. Secondly, the wage billing provision relates to the dispute on the amount of remuneration. Claims based on wage complaint provision need to be submitted to DOL. After submitting the DOL application, it is necessary to request waiver or introduction from DOL or the Office of Prosecutor Gen...
Read more

Five bank frauds - Title 18 - US Code - an explanation of section 1344

Image
Banking law violations and the use of financial institution accounts are generally prohibited as "bank fraud" in federal courts. The US law firm is responsible for real estate and securities seeking bank fraud accusations (offenses to crime officially) based on reliable noncomplicated theft, money embezzling by bankers, or a more complex plan To deceive based on false statements such as overestimation. The federal prosecutor's office also requests prosecution of bank fraud based on a complex scheme such as a series of false loan applications and improper use of loans or non-existent collateral. The United States Code includes federal crimes prosecuted by the Ministry of Justice in the esteemed district of the state or its local office, the US law firm. Title 18, United States Code, Section 1344, Section 1344 entitled Bank Fraud is deemed to be a crime to deceive a bank or to commit a misconduct on a financial institution's account. Title 18, U...
Read more